From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-12659-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.auc.dk>
Received: (qmail 3113 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2000 10:34:44 -0000
Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 16 Aug 2000 10:34:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 24603 invoked by alias); 16 Aug 2000 10:34:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 12659
Received: (qmail 24596 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2000 10:34:33 -0000
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 12:34:22 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <200008161034.MAA11486@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de>
From: Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk
In-reply-to: Peter Stephenson's message of Wed, 16 Aug 2000 11:12:20 +0100
Subject: Re: PATCH: $modules (was: Re: Seg fault with zmodload -u)


Peter Stephenson wrote:

> > No. It's that without aliases, `zmodload -A' prints a newline. I.e.,
> > one line. So `${${(f)"$(zmodload -A)"}%% *}' produces one string (an
> > empty one). This could have been fixes by using:
> > `${${${(f)"$(zmodload -A)"}%% *}:#}'.
> 
> % zmodload -A | od -t x2
> 0000000

But:

  % f() { echo $# }
  % f ${${(f)"$(zmodload -A)"}%% *}
  1
  % f ${${${(f)"$(zmodload -A)"}%% *}:#}
  0

It's in the "".

Bye
 Sven

P.S.: And of course, that meant that it was dependent on whether
      completion was tried with an empty or non-empty prefix.

--
Sven Wischnowsky                         wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de