From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9528 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2000 07:08:08 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 6 Sep 2000 07:08:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 5328 invoked by alias); 6 Sep 2000 07:07:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 12747 Received: (qmail 5321 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2000 07:07:56 -0000 Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 09:07:54 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200009060707.JAA13798@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: "Bart Schaefer"'s message of Tue, 5 Sep 2000 15:56:38 +0000 Subject: Re: PATCH: "User Contributions" manual, & misc. Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Sep 5, 10:34am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote: > } > } - The indexes for the styles say `completion style' even for those > } styles looked up with a non-:completion context. Sounds wrong, > } doesn't it? If only I knew what to write instead... > > I almost changed the predict-on style index entries to read "predictive > typing style" but that's too long to fit in the space info allots. > > Perhaps "widget style", since it's for a ZLE widget? (But there are > completion widgets, too, so ...) `utility style'? `misc.'? > } - The place where the zsh/zpty module is mentioned (in info, at the > } nslookup function) is messed up (by the automatic module-docs-stuff). > > Can you explain what's "messed up" in a bit more detail? Uh oh. Does that mean that you don't get this: nslookup [ ARG ... ] This wrapper function for the nslookup command requires the zsh/zpty +module. It behaves exactly like the standard nslookup except that it provides customizable prompts (including a The `+' before `module'. That first appeared when Zefram added the doc-part of the hierarchical-module-name stuff, I think. I complained at that time (and hence I think it may look like this in other places, too). Or is my zsh version here messed up, somehow, and noone else gets this? > (I didn't put > a cross-reference in there; perhaps that's what you think went wrong?) I was thinking about doing that myself and then found out that I'm too lazy ;-) Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de