From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6570 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2000 07:06:46 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 12 Oct 2000 07:06:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 7732 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2000 07:06:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 12973 Received: (qmail 7722 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2000 07:06:21 -0000 Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 09:06:18 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200010120706.JAA29984@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: "Bart Schaefer"'s message of Wed, 11 Oct 2000 14:55:45 +0000 Subject: Re: rename fake style? Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Oct 11, 9:40am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote: > } > } I already asked if we should (and still can) rename the fake style to > } fake-files, so this is mainly to ensure that I don't accidentally > } delete or overwrite the patch... > > I think that's a fine idea, but is this hunk really right? > > } @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ > } disable-stat c:bool > } domains c: > } expand c: > } - fake c:fake > } + fake c:fake-files > } fake-parameters c:fake-params > } file-patterns c:filepat > } file-sort c:fsort Hrmpf. Not really. I'll commit an improved version. Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de