From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7513 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2000 09:29:25 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 12 Oct 2000 09:29:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 20561 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2000 09:28:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 12978 Received: (qmail 20553 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2000 09:28:41 -0000 Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 11:28:39 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200010120928.LAA30246@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: Sven Wischnowsky's message of Thu, 12 Oct 2000 10:52:23 +0200 (MET DST) Subject: RE: completion widgets in menu selection I wrote: > ... > > I'd also like to point out to Jay (although he probably found that out > already), that all this doesn't really have anything to do with menu > completion, i.e. it works just fine without that. The discussion about > menu *selection* we had was about making such extra special key > bindings work from withing that (and it's the patch for that which has > been added). Before someone corrects me... of course there is a bit of interaction with menu completion or selection. Without that you won't be able to select that all-matches-match. For people who don't really like menu completion but sometimes envy people that use it, there is the automenu option (and the menu style). Using menu selection instead of ol' menu completion should make navigation easier. Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de