From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14126 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2000 07:22:19 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 26 Oct 2000 07:22:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 29591 invoked by alias); 26 Oct 2000 07:22:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 13086 Received: (qmail 29584 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2000 07:22:14 -0000 Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 09:22:10 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200010260722.JAA02146@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk CC: Vincent Lefevre In-reply-to: "Bart Schaefer"'s message of Thu, 26 Oct 2000 03:11:00 +0000 Subject: Re: [bug?] named directory tex and compinit Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Oct 25, 5:39pm, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > } > } The named directory disappears just after the _comps assignation > } in the .zcompdump file. And if I replace the "tex _tex" line by > } "ttex _tex", the named directory tex doesn't disappear. > > This indicates a pretty serious problem somewhere, as it would appear > that hash table entries from two entirely independent hash tables are > interfereing with each other. Yes, scary. > Is this the same OSF1 system where you're having ttyctl problems? I > would almost suspect some kind of memory alignment issue. Hm, memory alignment? I'm on such a 64bit system, too, and I don't have these problems. Is that zsh a vanilla 3.1.9? Freshly compiled for Alpha? Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de