From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15051 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2000 18:48:51 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (HELO sunsite.auc.dk) (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 8 Nov 2000 18:48:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 4028 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2000 18:48:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 13146 Received: (qmail 4021 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2000 18:48:43 -0000 Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 13:48:36 -0500 Message-Id: <200011081848.NAA00579@soup.ads.apexinc.com> X-Authentication-Warning: soup.ads.apexinc.com: ejb set sender to ejb@apexinc.com using -f From: "E. Jay Berkenbilt" To: wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de CC: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: <200011080918.KAA20945@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> (message from Sven Wischnowsky on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 10:18:28 +0100 (MET)) Subject: Re: PATCH: completing patterns (was: Re: PATCH: _rcs (was Re: still confused about completion and matching)) References: <200011080918.KAA20945@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > Ok, here is the patch how I'll commit it in a few moments. The two > lines Jay complained about (and which I weren't that sure about, too) > have been commented out (see 13074). Okay. > This patch does not include any changes to the handling of > insert-unambiguous as discussed in 13076/13077. Maybe if we change > the test in question so that menu completion is only started > (regardless of insert-unambiguous) if the unambiguous string is empty? > Or allow some more values for insert-unambiguous to express the > different ways to handle insertion of unambiguous strings? I don't have strong feelings about this. I don't completely understand it either though. > I would be thankful if Jay could confirm that I committed the right > patch (there were so many of them ;-). Consider it confirmed. I moved the patched files out of the way and did a cvs update. The only thing that has changed is the addition of the comment you included with the commenting out of those two lines... Now we'll see what happens. :-) Jay