From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5270 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2000 13:29:32 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (HELO sunsite.auc.dk) (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 21 Dec 2000 13:29:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 17874 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2000 13:29:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 13306 Received: (qmail 17867 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2000 13:29:23 -0000 Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 08:28:57 -0500 From: Clint Adams To: Zefram Cc: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: PATCH: Re: vicmd bindings Message-ID: <20001221082857.A28550@dman.com> References: <20001218120250.A28320@dman.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from zefram@fysh.org on Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 06:09:04PM +0000 > up-line-or-history leaves the cursor in the same column, as vi does, > when moving between lines within a single command. When it moves to > a prior history entry it does move to the end of the line; I'm in two > minds as to whether that should be changed. Based on what factors?