From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16864 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2001 13:41:52 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (HELO sunsite.auc.dk) (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 19 Jan 2001 13:41:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 24445 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2001 13:41:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 13377 Received: (qmail 24434 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2001 13:41:45 -0000 Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 14:41:43 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <200101191341.OAA13647@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: "Andrej Borsenkow"'s message of Fri, 19 Jan 2001 13:13:55 +0300 Subject: Re: Completion slowness in current CVS Andrej Borsenkow wrote: > I have the _feeling_ (no, I cannot prove it with any benchmarks) that > completion became slower. Specifically, partial path completion now takes more > time with the same pathes as before. As compared to when? It doens't feel slower for me, but I can have a look... does anyone else have the same impression? Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de