From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24709 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2001 14:16:26 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 26 Mar 2001 14:16:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 289 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2001 14:16:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 13773 Received: (qmail 277 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2001 14:16:16 -0000 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 16:16:16 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200103261416.QAA13557@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk In-reply-to: Oliver Kiddle's message of Thu, 22 Mar 2001 21:46:17 +0000 Subject: Re: Moving completion functions Oliver Kiddle wrote: > ... > > Finally, there was a mention at some point about changing the letters > of some compadd options as we were originally constrained by > consistency with compgen which had many of the old compctl options. Was > this ever done or looked in to? I suppose we still have compctl but > some could be better like -J and -V. See 8866, 13472 and 13494. I'm not sure how many users might have used compadd by now. Also I'm not sure if I want to go through all completion functions to change the option names used there. Oh, you meant to volunteer? ;-) Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de