From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29505 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2001 09:33:26 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 29 Mar 2001 09:33:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 26539 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2001 09:33:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 13834 Received: (qmail 26528 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2001 09:33:15 -0000 Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:33:15 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200103290933.LAA20464@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk In-reply-to: "Bart Schaefer"'s message of Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:14:01 +0000 Subject: Re: Moving completion functions Bart Schaefer wrote: > ... > > BTW, a remark on my sectioning scheme for the Test directory: Section Y > is for tests of builtin interactive commands/constructs (select, read -q, > etc.) where the tests themselves need to use the zpty module, which will > (eventually) have been tested in section X ... > > We might want to add description of this naming to a Test/README or to the > comments in ztst.zsh. Hmhm. Felix Rosencrantz wrote: > ... > > I've been busy and away, so I'm quite a bit behind on the mailing list. But > just wanted to stick my nose in.... It might be worth splitting completion and > the rest of zle in to separate sections. Both of these modules represent > a lot of space in the documentation and code. Because there is a lot of > code/functionality that can be tested, it seems like it would be worthwhile to > give each a separate section. That sounds sensible. Maybe start using lower-case letters for the parts that are big enough to be called `systems', i.e. completion and zftp and later probably more? Peter Stephenson wrote: > ... [ _wanted and firends ] > > In that case, better leave it, in case anyone's being looking at the user > guide, which makes quite heavy use of _wanted. That's fine with me. and Bart again: > I won't commit these yet (hence they're not presented in diff form); either > Sven can add them at the Great Renaming, or I'll add them after it happens. I've added that to the todo-list in the script. > The only reason for using _arguments in fned is to get "no more arguments" > behavior after the first name is completed; otherwise it could simply > call _functions directly. Or test [[ CURRENT -gt 2 ]] directly... Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de