From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-13910-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 28457 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2001 14:00:06 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 5 Apr 2001 14:00:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 10687 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2001 13:59:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 13910
Received: (qmail 10676 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2001 13:59:47 -0000
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 09:58:12 -0400
From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
To: Andrej Borsenkow <Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru>
Cc: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk
Subject: Re: zsh/termcap and zsh/terminfo modules
Message-ID: <20010405095812.A18353@dman.com>
References: <1010405001506.ZM644@candle.brasslantern.com> <001801c0bd94$16f37f80$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <001801c0bd94$16f37f80$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru>; from Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru on Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 09:48:50AM +0400

> Nope. I have both. Is it possible that one of them is linked statically? Check
> for zsh_cv_shared_tgetent and zsh_cv_shared_tigetstr. It may well be, tests
> take some of them wrong.

I have a vague recollection that this has something to do with people
wanting to link with libtermcap instead of ncurses.