From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23570 invoked from network); 2 May 2001 16:01:51 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 2 May 2001 16:01:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 11518 invoked by alias); 2 May 2001 16:01:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 14207 Received: (qmail 11489 invoked from network); 2 May 2001 16:01:40 -0000 From: "F. G. Marx" To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: _use_lo is still being refered to Date: Wed, 02 May 2001 11:55:44 -0400 Reply-To: fmarx@crosswinds.net In-Reply-To: <1010502075717.ZM7710@candle.brasslantern.com> X-Mailer: vmail-1.0 for vim-+python Message-Id: <20010502160134.5845C4CB99@member-mx1.crosswinds.net> Thank you. What an idiot. I discovered it ... in .zshrc, after going back to my study of the new completion system, and finding a reference to "compdef -P _gnu_generic '*'". I'd been over that same line when it read "compdef -P _use_lo '*'", and installed it.... Shared memory *is* used in the context of *.zwc files, is that not correct? Thanks, /f On Wed, 2 May 2001 07:57:17 +0000, "Bart Schaefer" wrote: > >On May 2, 1:31am, F. G. Marx wrote: >} >} Any posibility it's in shared memory (I run three vt's + X(-terms)) (and I >} test (and update zcompdump) in one vt while the old version runs in the >} others). > >No, it can't be shared memory. Have you tried `ls -l $^fpath/_use_lo' ? > >If all else fails, put `exec 2> /tmp/xtrace; set -x' very early in your >init files, and then look through the xtrace output for _use_lo. > >-- >Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises >http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com > >Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net > > ------------------------------------------------ f.g.marx