From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9249 invoked from network); 15 May 2001 07:06:30 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 15 May 2001 07:06:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 19337 invoked by alias); 15 May 2001 07:06:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 14345 Received: (qmail 19318 invoked from network); 15 May 2001 07:06:17 -0000 From: Sven Wischnowsky Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 09:05:47 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200105150705.JAA09172@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: Latest hist-immediate-drop patch In-Reply-To: Wayne Davison wrote: > [...] Both Zefram and > Sven voted for the inclusion of the option, though, which is the "safe" > choice (and everyone else has abstained). I'd be quite happy to remove > the hist_immediate_drop option from my patch if we can reach some sort > of an agreement here. Any changed votes? Any new votes? Or shall I > just take the bull by the horns and decide for us all? Actually I meant that I liked the behaviour (and didn't care much about whether we'd add a new option for it or not -- I said `feature', not `option' ;-). Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de