From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9660 invoked from network); 24 May 2001 04:49:39 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 24 May 2001 04:49:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 23827 invoked by alias); 24 May 2001 04:49:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 14467 Received: (qmail 23816 invoked from network); 24 May 2001 04:49:30 -0000 Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 00:49:26 -0400 From: Clint Adams To: nce@SLAC.Stanford.EDU Cc: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: 64-bit sparc instructions Message-ID: <20010524004926.A10577@dman.com> References: <20010523192407.D9730@flora01.SLAC.Stanford.EDU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010523192407.D9730@flora01.SLAC.Stanford.EDU>; from nce@SLAC.Stanford.EDU on Wed, May 23, 2001 at 07:24:08PM -0700 > I'd been thinking the cause of the trouble was equally probable between > the compiler and the 64-bit libraries, but it seems you've eliminated > both. Does echo =(echo foo) crash the gcc executable as well? % Src/zsh -f % echo =(echo foo) /tmp/zshYdd7uR % exit % file Src/zsh Src/zsh: ELF 64-bit MSB executable, SPARC V9, version 1, statically linked, not stripped The above machine is a Sun Blade 1000 running Debian. The binary was compiled with the prerelease gcc. % Src/zsh -f zsh: failed to load module: zsh/zle % echo =(echo foo) zsh: segmentation fault (core dumped) Src/zsh -f % file Src/zsh Src/zsh: ELF 64-bit MSB executable SPARCV9 Version 1, UltraSPARC1 Extensions Required, dynamically linked, stripped The above machine is an Ultra 80 running Solaris 8. The binary was compiled with Forte C. I'll see about getting the same version of gcc on that box to provide a better comparison.