From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3048 invoked from network); 29 May 2001 22:28:36 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 29 May 2001 22:28:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 8878 invoked by alias); 29 May 2001 20:13:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 14551 Received: (qmail 8862 invoked from network); 29 May 2001 20:13:35 -0000 Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 16:12:04 -0400 From: Clint Adams To: Andrej Borsenkow Cc: Bart Schaefer , ZSH Workers Mailing List Subject: Re: termcap bug on Linux Message-ID: <20010529161204.A5851@dman.com> References: <3B10FCA4.2000009@mow.siemens.ru> <1010528222527.ZM7246@candle.brasslantern.com> <3B13E52D.5050308@mow.siemens.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3B13E52D.5050308@mow.siemens.ru>; from Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru on Tue, May 29, 2001 at 10:06:37PM +0400 > Yes. I don't know if I ever received 13988, but I don't think I ever read it. AB> In such cases I always ask myself - what happens, if a program is linked AB> against dynamic library? Is it possible to silently exchange 4.2 version AB> against 5.2 version? That would definitely break a lot of things. On a sane system the soname should reflect the major number. So zsh linked against /usr/lib/libncurses.so.5 would not run on a system with only /usr/lib/libncurses.so.4.