From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18410 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2001 06:16:04 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 8 Jun 2001 06:16:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 9986 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2001 06:15:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 14798 Received: (qmail 9968 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2001 06:15:42 -0000 Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 23:15:34 -0700 From: Jos Backus To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: 4.0.1: problem with sourcing on Solaris Message-ID: <20010607231534.A56430@lizzy.bugworks.com> Reply-To: Jos Backus Mail-Followup-To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk References: <20010604143759.A91833@lizzy.bugworks.com> <1010605061126.ZM4201@candle.brasslantern.com> <20010605141619.A36532@lizzy.bugworks.com> <1010608045050.ZM1210@candle.brasslantern.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <1010608045050.ZM1210@candle.brasslantern.com>; from schaefer@candle.brasslantern.com on Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 04:50:27AM +0000 On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 04:50:27AM +0000, Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Jun 5, 2:16pm, Jos Backus wrote: > } BROKEN_KILL_ESRCH (the default), the shell works fine. I'm wondering > } how this could end up being define'd... > > It could end up being defined because the configure test for it is bad. I thought the configure test looked kind of too simple. Good catch Bart. -- Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/ "Modularity is not a hack." _/ _/ _/ -- D. J. Bernstein _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ josb@cncdsl.com _/_/ _/_/_/ use Std::Disclaimer;