From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-15179-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 2424 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2001 13:52:08 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 29 Jun 2001 13:52:08 -0000
Received: (qmail 24252 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2001 13:51:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 15179
Received: (qmail 24228 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2001 13:51:14 -0000
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 09:51:54 -0400
From: Clint Adams <clint@zsh.org>
To: Andrej Borsenkow <Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru>
Cc: Tomi.Vainio@Sun.COM, zsh-workers@sunsite.dk
Subject: Re: Zsh 4.0.2 + 64bit Solaris 8 Forte 6.1 compiler
Message-ID: <20010629095154.A24508@dman.com>
References: <15162.62750.136548.435614@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <000601c0ffb5$999f20c0$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <000601c0ffb5$999f20c0$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru>; from Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru on Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 01:34:59PM +0400

> So, what others think? Should we change it to -KPIC for Solaris?

Except for gcc of course.

> No. Next thing is - why should zsh default to LP64 (that is what you mean.
> Zsh already supports 64-bit atithmetic and large files)? Does it fix
> something or adds new features?

It shouldn't; it should default to the default.