From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25860 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2001 08:22:44 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 11 Jul 2001 08:22:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 20641 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2001 08:22:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 15371 Received: (qmail 20629 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2001 08:22:32 -0000 From: Sven Wischnowsky Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:20:07 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200107110820.KAA17252@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: zsh 4.x bug in completion? In-Reply-To: <1010710163318.ZM29403@candle.brasslantern.com> Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Jul 10, 10:32am, Peter Stephenson wrote: > } Subject: Re: zsh 4.x bug in completion? > } > } Sven Wischnowsky wrote: > } > Should this and/or the _man thing go into the stable branch? (I.e., is > } > that to be updated until the next stable release?) > } > } You could wait till nearer the time if you prefer. > > On the other hand, the longer you wait, the more likely there is to be a > conflict with some other change. It's easier to merge when code differs > less. Yes, I came to the same conclusion yesterday evening. So I've committed them now. Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de