From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2266 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2001 13:43:23 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 6 Aug 2001 13:43:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 23965 invoked by alias); 6 Aug 2001 13:43:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 15572 Received: (qmail 23950 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2001 13:43:10 -0000 Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 14:43:09 +0100 From: Adam Spiers To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: instant core dump with latest CVS Message-ID: <20010806144309.B28266@thelonious.new.ox.ac.uk> Reply-To: Adam Spiers Mail-Followup-To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk References: <20010730155307.A16163@thelonious.new.ox.ac.uk> <200107310943.LAA01187@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200107310943.LAA01187@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de>; from wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de on Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 11:43:48AM +0200 X-Home-Page: http://www.new.ox.ac.uk/~adam/ X-OS: RedHat Linux Sven Wischnowsky (wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de) wrote: > Adam Spiers wrote: > > My newly-compiled zsh core-dumps as soon as you run it. > > Can't reproduce it. Is this with an older zwc file, perchance? We had > 15030, changing the way for-loops are stored an inthat line there, there > is a for loop... That was it, thanks. > And I forgot to make sure the zwc version number got incremented for > 15030. Shouldn't it be incremented now then?