From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-16045-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 11018 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2001 12:07:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.90)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 15 Oct 2001 12:07:13 -0000
Received: (qmail 3073 invoked by alias); 15 Oct 2001 12:07:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 16045
Received: (qmail 3060 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2001 12:07:03 -0000
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 08:06:51 -0400
From: Clint Adams <clint@zsh.org>
To: Peter Stephenson <pws@pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk>
Cc: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk>
Subject: Re: differences between the two branches
Message-ID: <20011015080651.A11698@dman.com>
References: <1011013073937.ZM368@candle.brasslantern.com> <20001014190253.4AC4E14283@pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20001014190253.4AC4E14283@pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk>; from pws@pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk on Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 08:02:48PM +0100

> I will not be moving other people's patches to 4.0 myself, now or ever,

> Clint: compaudit, probably OK, maybe even necessary on Debian.
> Clint: his prompt theme, dunno.

I've committed these two to 4.0 and left the rest.