From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8014 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2001 17:26:09 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 25 Oct 2001 17:26:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 19707 invoked by alias); 25 Oct 2001 17:26:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 16160 Received: (qmail 19688 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2001 17:26:00 -0000 Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 18:25:59 +0100 From: Adam Spiers To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: ChangeLog formatting? Message-ID: <20011025182559.A30723@thelonious.new.ox.ac.uk> Reply-To: Adam Spiers Mail-Followup-To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk References: <011023170532.ZM19347@candle.brasslantern.com> <20011024100226.B25268@dman.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20011024100226.B25268@dman.com>; from clint@zsh.org on Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 10:02:26AM -0400 X-Home-Page: http://www.new.ox.ac.uk/~adam/ X-OS: RedHat Linux Clint Adams (clint@zsh.org) wrote: > I like "article number: short description", and I prefer to commit all > files at once. Thus the ChangeLog entry, the cvs log entry, and the > diffs all correspond to the patch posted to the mailing list. That gets my vote. Related changes are best committed atomically, IMHO.