From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22594 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2002 23:43:37 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 28 Feb 2002 23:43:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 4564 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2002 23:43:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 16744 Received: (qmail 4552 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2002 23:43:31 -0000 Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 18:42:40 -0500 From: Clint Adams To: wizo@ludens.elte.hu Cc: ZSH-WORKERS@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: tar's comletention of zsh Message-ID: <20020228234240.GA10177@dman.com> References: <00A0A43E.B56EA4C2.2@ludens.elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00A0A43E.B56EA4C2.2@ludens.elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i > In the file /usr/share/doc/zsh/examples/jhm.zshrc.gz in my opinion This isn't part of the upstream source; this is Ray Dassen's .zshrc, which is quite old. > the next section is not really correct, because lots of systems > (e.a. the linux [in this time]) the tar extract the .tar.bz with > ``j'' option, (e.a. tar xfvj linux-2.2.20.tar.bz2). > The ``I'' parameter doesn't work. At the time, -j was not a standard option to tar (Debian used -I, and FreeBSD used -y, for example). I'll remove this file from the Debian package to avoid confusion.