From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-16900-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 22591 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2002 18:15:41 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 25 Mar 2002 18:15:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 23769 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2002 18:15:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 16900
Received: (qmail 23757 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2002 18:15:31 -0000
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 18:15:29 +0000
From: Adam Spiers <adam@spiers.net>
To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk
Subject: Re: C02cond.ztst failure: -N
Message-ID: <20020325181529.A16656@corelli.new.ox.ac.uk>
Reply-To: Adam Spiers <adam@spiers.net>
Mail-Followup-To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk
References: <20020325165421.A16060@corelli.new.ox.ac.uk> <1020325170036.ZM31601@candle.brasslantern.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <1020325170036.ZM31601@candle.brasslantern.com>; from schaefer@brasslantern.com on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 05:00:36PM +0000
X-URL: http://tigerpig.org/
X-OS: RedHat Linux
Sender: "Adam Spiers,,07775562717,020 88 30 30 35" <adam@corelli.new.ox.ac.uk>

Bart Schaefer (schaefer@brasslantern.com) wrote:
> On Mar 25,  4:54pm, Adam Spiers wrote:
> }
> } Was testing: -N cond
> } ./C02cond.ztst: test failed.
> } 
> } Could this be because the compile is happening on an NFS-mounted
> } drive?
> 
> Yes, that's a very likely cause.

In that case, would it be worth adding a check and skipping the test
when appropriate?  Or, if that's not easily done in a portable
fashion, maybe it's worth adding a "This test might fail" type of
message?