From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-17073-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 20083 invoked from network); 3 May 2002 19:01:17 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 3 May 2002 19:01:17 -0000
Received: (qmail 12203 invoked by alias); 3 May 2002 19:01:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 17073
Received: (qmail 12186 invoked from network); 3 May 2002 19:01:05 -0000
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 12:00:59 -0700
From: Danek Duvall <duvall@emufarm.org>
To: Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@yahoo.co.uk>
Cc: Zsh Workers <zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk>
Subject: Re: Bug in _path_files?
Message-ID: <20020503190059.GA2656@lorien.emufarm.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Danek Duvall <duvall@emufarm.org>,
	Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@yahoo.co.uk>,
	Zsh Workers <zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk>
References: <20020502191319.GA2807@lorien.emufarm.org> <20020503105200.GA1110@logica.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20020503105200.GA1110@logica.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i

On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 11:52:00AM +0100, Oliver Kiddle wrote:

> The patch looks correct to me. However, it leaves some code that I
> believe to be redundant so I suggest the following patch instead which
> I think makes the code a bit simpler (hopefully without breaking it).

I was going for the least-change solution, but this is better, looks
correct, and works where I need it to.

Thanks!

Danek