From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10711 invoked from network); 21 May 2002 12:49:12 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 21 May 2002 12:49:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 29931 invoked by alias); 21 May 2002 12:49:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 17202 Received: (qmail 29912 invoked from network); 21 May 2002 12:49:01 -0000 X-VirusChecked: Checked Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 13:48:32 +0100 From: Oliver Kiddle To: Peter Stephenson Cc: Zsh hackers list Subject: Re: PATCH: more selection Message-ID: <20020521124832.GA10428@logica.com> References: <21560.1021303981@csr.com> <29266.1021980087@csr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <29266.1021980087@csr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: Oliver Kiddle On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 12:21:27PM +0100, Peter Stephenson wrote: > only with zle -F, so that part could be done without the module if we > implemented the bash version of `read -t '. It's annoying I > picked that letter for polling.) If the timeout is considered to be an optional argument, is there really any conflict there? The timeout defaulting to zero would give exactly the same as current behaviour so it could be compatible with both older zsh and bash/ksh93. right? Oliver This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.