From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11507 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2002 21:24:26 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 10 Oct 2002 21:24:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 19013 invoked by alias); 10 Oct 2002 21:24:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 17805 Received: (qmail 19001 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2002 21:24:12 -0000 Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 23:15:47 +0200 From: DervishD To: Jason Price Cc: Zsh Subject: Re: Recursion and shell functions Message-ID: <20021010211547.GD10963@DervishD> Mail-Followup-To: Jason Price , Zsh References: <20021010194154.GA10963@DervishD> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: Pleyades Net Hi Jason :) > > First of all, please excuse this a-bit-off-topic question, but I > > need to know if a feature available in zsh is portable. > You could re-invent the wheel, but why? > (cd ; tar -cpvf - .) | ( cd ; tar -xpf -) Thanks for your answer, Jason, but I don't want to make the software dependent on 'tar'. In fact I don't have tar on my system! I use 'pax' instead ;)) The aim is to depend only on the shell and POSIX utilities (like 'cp', 'rm, etc... you know.). I want to impose little or no dependencies. 'tar' is not a good solution for me, I prefer 'pax', although is not as extended by now, 'rsync' seems to big for copying a few bunch of files, and 'ssh'... well... Thanks again. Raśl