From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-17965-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 29180 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2002 11:40:31 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 26 Nov 2002 11:40:31 -0000
Received: (qmail 2221 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2002 11:40:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 17965
Received: (qmail 2198 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2002 11:40:23 -0000
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 06:40:16 -0500
From: Clint Adams <clint@zsh.org>
To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk
Subject: zsh/mathfunc and scalb
Message-ID: <20021126114016.GA27529@dman.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/)

IEEE 1003.1-2001 claims that scalb is deprecated and that the prototype
is double scalb(double, double).  glibc 2.3 uses the same prototype, but
only if you define _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED, _BSD_SOURCE, or _SVID_SOURCE.

zsh passes an int as the second argument, and of course it links fine.

Should this be changed to scalbln or scalbn?  Should the $(( )) name
be changed as well?