From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3630 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2003 09:31:41 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 10 Feb 2003 09:31:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 1719 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2003 09:31:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 18217 Received: (qmail 1703 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2003 09:31:28 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Feb 2003 09:31:28 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [81.5.149.242] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 10 Feb 2003 9:31:23 -0000 Received: from zefram by bowl.fysh.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18iAHe-00051N-00 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 09:31:26 +0000 Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 09:31:25 +0000 To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: PATCH: maxfilelocks in ulimit output Message-ID: <20030210093125.GB14223@fysh.org> References: <20030209224506.GA25964@scowler.net> <6134254DE87BD411908B00A0C99B044F03A0B63B@mowd019a.mow.siemens.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6134254DE87BD411908B00A0C99B044F03A0B63B@mowd019a.mow.siemens.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Zefram Borzenkov Andrey wrote: >Untested idea (not having the relevant system and time :( It's better not to rely on being able to run programs at configure time, to allow for cross compilation. It may be better in this case to turn the troublesome preprocessor conditionals into C conditionals -- gcc, at least, will optimise them away. -zefram