From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29086 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2003 04:05:23 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 27 Feb 2003 04:05:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 5064 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2003 04:05:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 18308 Received: (qmail 5052 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2003 04:05:16 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Feb 2003 04:05:15 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [130.207.165.230] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 27 Feb 2003 4:5:15 -0000 Received: by cyberbuzz.gatech.edu (Postfix, from userid 20135) id 186A179453; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 23:05:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 23:05:14 -0500 From: Jason Price To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: single manpage vs multiple files Message-ID: <20030226230514.A28631@redfish.gatech.edu> References: <20030227034129.GA21919@node1.opengeometry.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030227034129.GA21919@node1.opengeometry.net>; from opengeometry@yahoo.ca on Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 10:41:29PM -0500 On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 10:41:29PM -0500, William Park wrote: > What is the reason for separating Zsh manpage into several files? A > single manpage (ie. man zsh) would be easier, no? Because it's enormous? "Back in the day" of 2400 baud modems when I was in college, doing a "man zsh | write " was considered by some to be funny (before people got clever and did things like 'cat /dev/kmem | od | write....). However, on all the installs I have around have a zshall man page that people can get to if they really want. Jason