From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28927 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2003 03:41:41 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 27 Feb 2003 03:41:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 25872 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2003 03:41:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 18307 Received: (qmail 25865 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2003 03:41:34 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Feb 2003 03:41:34 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [64.56.232.6] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 27 Feb 2003 3:41:34 -0000 Received: (from parkw@localhost) by node1.opengeometry.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h1R3fT821928 for zsh-workers@sunsite.dk; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 22:41:29 -0500 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 22:41:29 -0500 From: William Park To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: single manpage vs multiple files Message-ID: <20030227034129.GA21919@node1.opengeometry.net> Mail-Followup-To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i What is the reason for separating Zsh manpage into several files? A single manpage (ie. man zsh) would be easier, no? -- William Park, Open Geometry Consulting, Linux solution for data management and processing.