From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29224 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2003 04:15:15 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 27 Feb 2003 04:15:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 8556 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2003 04:15:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 18309 Received: (qmail 8549 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2003 04:15:08 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Feb 2003 04:15:08 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [199.67.51.101] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 27 Feb 2003 4:15:7 -0000 Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) id h1R4F7dA093093 for zsh-workers@sunsite.dk; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 22:15:07 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 22:15:07 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: single manpage vs multiple files Message-ID: <20030227041507.GB25640@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20030227034129.GA21919@node1.opengeometry.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030227034129.GA21919@node1.opengeometry.net> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i In the last episode (Feb 26), William Park said: > What is the reason for separating Zsh manpage into several files? A > single manpage (ie. man zsh) would be easier, no? Hey, at least we're nowhere near as bad as perl! (dan.2) /home/dan> man perl zsh: do you wish to see all 97 possibilities (25 lines)? The only zsh manpage you really need is 'zshall', which is all the little ones tacked together. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com