From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29748 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2003 04:49:26 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 27 Feb 2003 04:49:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 21112 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2003 04:49:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 18310 Received: (qmail 21092 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2003 04:49:18 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Feb 2003 04:49:18 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [64.56.232.6] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 27 Feb 2003 4:49:17 -0000 Received: (from parkw@localhost) by node1.opengeometry.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h1R4nBk29105 for zsh-workers@sunsite.dk; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 23:49:11 -0500 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 23:49:11 -0500 From: William Park To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: single manpage vs multiple files Message-ID: <20030227044911.GA22050@node1.opengeometry.net> Mail-Followup-To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk References: <20030227034129.GA21919@node1.opengeometry.net> <20030226230514.A28631@redfish.gatech.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030226230514.A28631@redfish.gatech.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 11:05:14PM -0500, Jason Price wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 10:41:29PM -0500, William Park wrote: > > What is the reason for separating Zsh manpage into several files? A > > single manpage (ie. man zsh) would be easier, no? > However, on all the installs I have around have a zshall man page that > people can get to if they really want. On my Zsh-4.0.1 and -4.0.6, 'zshall.1' and 'zsh.1' are the same. -- William Park, Open Geometry Consulting, Linux solution for data management and processing.