From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18757 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2003 07:45:40 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 14 Mar 2003 07:45:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 25991 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 2003 07:45:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 18350 Received: (qmail 25984 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2003 07:45:33 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Mar 2003 07:45:33 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [203.109.249.142] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 14 Mar 2003 7:45:32 -0000 Received: from p84-tnt6.syd.ihug.com.au (localhost.localdomain) [203.173.146.84] by grunt22.ihug.com.au with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18tcm4-0002tc-00; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 11:10:13 +1100 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h2E0EtaJ006284 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 11:14:56 +1100 Received: (from doug@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id h2E0Eo90006282 for zsh-workers@sunsite.dk; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 11:14:50 +1100 X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: doug set sender to djkea2@mugca.its.monash.edu.au using -f Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 11:14:50 +1100 From: Doug Kearns To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Completion and command versions Message-ID: <20030314001450.GE954@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Is there a policy regarding the command version that completion functions should support? What about commands where there are significant changes between versions? Any thoughts? Thanks, Doug