From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14276 invoked from network); 15 May 2003 09:37:24 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 15 May 2003 09:37:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 25105 invoked by alias); 15 May 2003 09:37:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 18540 Received: (qmail 25098 invoked from network); 15 May 2003 09:37:16 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 May 2003 09:37:16 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [195.167.170.152] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 15 May 2003 9:37:16 -0000 Received: from zefram by bowl.fysh.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19GFAp-00074i-00; Thu, 15 May 2003 10:37:15 +0100 Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 10:37:15 +0100 To: Peter Stephenson Cc: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: Bug#190948: Violation against The Single UNIX ? Specification, Version 2 Message-ID: <20030515093715.GC16886@fysh.org> References: <1787.1052921646@csr.com> <82.1052990223@csr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <82.1052990223@csr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Zefram Peter Stephenson wrote: >/* ZLE entry point pointers. They are defined here because the initial * > * values depend on whether ZLE is linked in or not -- if it is, we * > * avoid wasting space with the fallback functions. No other source * > * file needs to know which modules are linked in. */ > >Except we don't avoid wasting space with the fallback functions, they >are defined unconditionally. Anyone remember what's happening? I wrote that comment. The intent was as described, and I have a mental image of the fallback functions being in an appropriate conditional section. I remember adding mechanism to the build process to make that information available to the preprocessor. If the fallback functions are no longer conditionally compiled, it'll be an accidental change, unless I got it wrong to start with. -zefram