From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3987 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2003 17:11:55 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 4 Jul 2003 17:11:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 1544 invoked by alias); 4 Jul 2003 17:11:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 18814 Received: (qmail 1534 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2003 17:11:50 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Jul 2003 17:11:50 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [217.174.194.138] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 4 Jul 2003 17:11:50 -0000 Received: from DervishD.pleyades.net (212.Red-80-35-44.pooles.rima-tde.net [80.35.44.212]) by madrid10.amenworld.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id h64HBla16361; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 19:11:47 +0200 Received: from raul@pleyades.net by DervishD.pleyades.net with local (Exim MTA 2.05) id <19YU7H-0001u6-00>; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 19:12:59 +0200 Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 19:12:59 +0200 From: DervishD To: Martin Dalum Cc: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: qconfirm enabled Message-ID: <20030704171259.GB7311@DervishD> Mail-Followup-To: Martin Dalum , zsh-workers@sunsite.dk References: <86of0atfi5.fsf@webz.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <86of0atfi5.fsf@webz.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: Pleyades User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Hi Martin :) * Martin Dalum dixit: > We have enabled qconfirm for zsh-workers@sunsite.dk. Nice, but, does that mean that current subscriber must confirm their messages too or just non-subscribers? I don't know how qconfirm works for lists :?? Anyway, with qconfirm any non-subscriber must send two messages for every message he/she wants to send. With just one or two messages this is not an issue, but for higher traffic, won't be shorter, faster and more effective to subscribe? That's two messages for subscribing and two for unsubscribing, but in the interim no duplicates are needed. I encourage non-subscriber to subscribe, certainly. The list is low traffic and quite interesting (well, except the effin spam thing, you know...). Thanks for helping with the spam issue. Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado -- Linux Registered User 88736 http://www.pleyades.net & http://raul.pleyades.net/