From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25373 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2003 06:09:29 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 19 Jul 2003 06:09:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 26540 invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2003 06:09:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 18871 Received: (qmail 26530 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2003 06:09:25 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 19 Jul 2003 06:09:25 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [203.109.249.142] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 19 Jul 2003 6:9:24 -0000 Received: from p109-apx1.syd.ihug.com.au (localhost.localdomain) [203.173.140.109] by grunt22.ihug.com.au with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19dkuI-00018T-00; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 16:09:22 +1000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h6J6OCo2012130 for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 16:24:12 +1000 Received: (from doug@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id h6J6OAAA012128 for zsh-workers@sunsite.dk; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 16:24:10 +1000 X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: doug set sender to djkea2@mugca.its.monash.edu.au using -f Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 16:24:10 +1000 From: Doug Kearns To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: conventions for completion functions Message-ID: <20030719062410.GA1020@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk References: <13416.1058460430@gmcs3.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <13416.1058460430@gmcs3.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 06:47:10PM +0200, Oliver Kiddle wrote: > The following patch adds a section to the completion-style-guide file > to document them. Let me know if you think of any other points I should > make or if you disagree with any of the points. It looks good to me, thanks. You might like to add a note about supporting the latest stable versions of commands, as per your reply in 18353. Regards, Doug