From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9489 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2003 17:42:08 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 30 Aug 2003 17:42:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 1521 invoked by alias); 30 Aug 2003 17:42:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 18979 Received: (qmail 1507 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2003 17:42:02 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 30 Aug 2003 17:42:02 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [195.92.195.174] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 30 Aug 2003 17:42:1 -0000 Received: from modem-218.imperator-angel.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.137.32.218] helo=pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk) by cmailg4.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19t9jc-0005Un-Cq for zsh-workers@sunsite.dk; Sat, 30 Aug 2003 18:42:00 +0100 Received: by pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4EA308511; Sat, 30 Aug 2003 13:45:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16A8F84E1 for ; Sat, 30 Aug 2003 18:45:52 +0100 (BST) To: Zsh workers Subject: Re: possible patches for merging to 4.0 In-reply-to: "Oliver Kiddle"'s message of "Fri, 29 Aug 2003 16:10:40 +0200." <4262.1062166240@gmcs3.local> Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 18:45:50 +0100 From: Peter Stephenson Message-Id: <20030830174552.4EA308511@pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk> Oliver Kiddle wrote: > I went through the output of difflog.pl and the following is a list of > patches which I think might be suitable for merging back into 4.0. Where > I've not otherwise specified, patches are from Peter. Thanks for looking. Go ahead and apply them, if you like. Translation: I'm not likely to have time for this. However, I will get round to it eventually. Some of them I'm surprised I didn't apply straight away. > 18839/18840 _nice: remember what was committed was not quite the patch that appeared. > 18769 This is the failed autoload fix... I was pretty convinced that this had to be correct to prevent some horrific problems, the more so the more I thought about it, but Bart didn't seem quite so convinced, so I never got around to committing it back to 4.0. > 18264 This fixes a minor memory leak when entering a subshell. Since it only happens once in the subshell when you enter it, I vaguely thought it was unnecessarily complicated to port back to 4.0, but it seems to be working so it's probably OK. > 17295 I don't think zle -F was in 4.0. > 17175 I think this also applies only to 4.1, since 4.0 doesn't have the (slightly hairy) fix that (( foo = ... )) didn't work if foo expanded to something that couldn't be parsed as an arithmetic expression, even though it correctly assigned it if it did. > 16737 (Bart) This fixed a problem with [ -d = ... ]. Bart's question never got answered, but I don't suppose it will without some hairier test tests. -- Peter Stephenson Work: pws@csr.com Web: http://www.pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk