From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14343 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2003 22:48:35 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 6 Oct 2003 22:48:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 9369 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2003 22:48:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 19169 Received: (qmail 9342 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2003 22:48:29 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Oct 2003 22:48:29 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [195.92.195.172] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 6 Oct 2003 22:48:29 -0000 Received: from modem-245.dusty-damsel.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.137.3.245] helo=pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk) by cmailg2.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1A6e9U-0003n9-I3 for zsh-workers@sunsite.dk; Mon, 06 Oct 2003 23:48:29 +0100 Received: by pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 501) id A420B84E0; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 18:49:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9744484C7 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 23:49:59 +0100 (BST) To: Zsh hackers list Subject: Re: [bug-report] ztrftime and datetime strftime In-reply-to: "Peter Stephenson"'s message of "Mon, 06 Oct 2003 23:42:02 BST." <20031006224203.BAF8A84E0@pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk> Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 23:49:58 +0100 From: Peter Stephenson Message-Id: <20031006224959.A420B84E0@pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk> Peter Stephenson wrote: > > strftime %c $SECS By the way, what are we going to rename this to? I'll impose EPOCHTIME or EPOCHSECONDS (depending on how I feel tomorrow) if nobody has any stronger preferences. > None of this gives me a warm and fuzzy feeling about the internals. Nice to be back from holiday. I've committed it anyway since it seems at least to be better. -- Peter Stephenson Work: pws@csr.com Web: http://www.pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk