From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-19170-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 3298 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2003 23:02:12 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 6 Oct 2003 23:02:12 -0000
Received: (qmail 14406 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2003 23:02:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 19170
Received: (qmail 14392 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2003 23:02:04 -0000
Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 6 Oct 2003 23:02:04 -0000
X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk)
Received: from [192.54.253.222] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 6 Oct 2003 23:2:2 -0000
Received: by binome.blorf.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id A9EDA2EF77; Mon,  6 Oct 2003 16:02:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 16:02:01 -0700
From: Wayne Davison <wayned@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Peter Stephenson <pws@pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk>
Cc: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@sunsite.dk>
Subject: Re: [bug-report] ztrftime and datetime strftime
Message-ID: <20031006230201.GA32187@binome.blorf.net>
References: <20031006224203.BAF8A84E0@pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk> <20031006224959.A420B84E0@pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20031006224959.A420B84E0@pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:49:58PM +0100, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> By the way, what are we going to rename this to?  I'll impose EPOCHTIME
> or EPOCHSECONDS (depending on how I feel tomorrow) if nobody has any
> stronger preferences.

I think that EPOCHSECONDS is very clear and precise, and thus a good
choice.

..wayne..