patch to update _apt

patch to update _apt

[Stephen Rueger]

Hello!

This patch updates _apt to work with APT 0.5.14, now part of both Debian
testing and unstable. It does not treat older versions different, so
people using it with e.g. Debian stable will get erroneous
completions. Is that behaviour acceptable or should i add a test solving
this issue?


--- _apt	2003-11-18 13:56:11.000000000 +0100
+++ _apt.new	2003-11-18 13:56:18.000000000 +0100
@@ -396,10 +396,11 @@
     -q,--quiet,--silent:intlevel \
     -d,--download-only:bool \
     -b,--compile,--build:bool \
-    -s,--simulate,--just-print,--recon,--no-act:bool \
+    -s,--simulate,--just-print,--dry-run,--recon,--no-act:bool \
     -y,--yes,--assume-yes:bool \
     -f,--fix-broken:bool \
     -u,--show-upgraded:bool \
+    -V,--verbose-versions:bool \
     -m,--ignore-missing,--fix-missing:bool \
     --no-download:bool \
     --ignore-hold:bool \
@@ -417,6 +418,7 @@
     --only-source:bool \
     --diff-only:bool \
     --tar-only:bool \
+    --arch-only:bool \
     -- \
     /$'update\0'/ \| \
     /$'upgrade\0'/ \| \
@@ -455,8 +457,9 @@
     -i,--important:bool \
     -f,--full:bool \
     -g,--generate:bool \
-    --names-only:bool \
+    -n,--names-only:bool \
     --all-names:bool \
+    -a,--all-versions:bool \
     --recurse:bool \
     -c,--config-file:configfile \
     -o,--option:arbitem \
@@ -470,14 +473,15 @@
     /$'dump\0'/ \| \
     /$'dumpavail\0'/ \| \
     /$'unmet\0'/ \| \
-    /$'check\0'/ \| \
     /$'search\0'/ /$'[^\0]#\0'/ ':strings:pattern:' \| \
     /$'show\0'/ /$'[^\0]#\0'/ ':packages::_deb_packages "$expl_packages[@]" avail' \# \| \
-    /$'depends\0'/ \| \
-    /$'pkgnames\0'/ \| \
-    /$'dotty\0'/ \| \
+    /$'depends\0'/ /$'[^\0]#\0'/ ':packages::_deb_packages "$expl_packages[@]" avail' \# \| \
+    /$'rdepends\0'/ /$'[^\0]#\0'/ ':packages::_deb_packages "$expl_packages[@]" avail' \# \| \
+    /$'pkgnames\0'/ /$'[^\0]#\0'/ ':strings:prefix:' \| \
+    /$'dotty\0'/ /$'[^\0]#\0'/ ':packages::_deb_packages "$expl_packages[@]" avail' \# \| \
+    /$'xvcg\0'/ /$'[^\0]#\0'/ ':packages::_deb_packages "$expl_packages[@]" avail' \# \| \
     /$'policy\0'/ /$'[^\0]#\0'/ ':packages::_deb_packages "$expl_packages[@]" avail' \# \| \
-    /"[]"/ ':argument-1::compadd "$expl_action[@]" help add gencaches showpkg showsrc stats dump dumpavail unmet check search show depends pkgnames dotty policy'
+    /"[]"/ ':argument-1::compadd "$expl_action[@]" help add gencaches showpkg showsrc stats dump dumpavail unmet search show depends rdepends pkgnames dotty policy xvcg'
 
   _apt-cache () {
     local expl_action expl_packages expl_pkg_cache expl_src_cache
@@ -506,7 +510,8 @@
     -o,--option:arbitem \
     -- \
     /$'add\0'/ \| \
-    /"[]"/	':argument-1::compadd "$expl_action[@]" add'
+    /$'ident\0'/ \| \
+    /"[]"/	':argument-1::compadd "$expl_action[@]" add ident'
 
   _apt-cdrom () {
     local expl_action expl_mount_point

-- 
Stephen Rüger
stephen.rueger@rechnerpost.org

Re: patch to update _apt

[Oliver Kiddle]

On 18 Nov, Stephen Rueger wrote:
> 
> This patch updates _apt to work with APT 0.5.14, now part of both Debian
> testing and unstable. It does not treat older versions different, so
> people using it with e.g. Debian stable will get erroneous
> completions. Is that behaviour acceptable or should i add a test solving
> this issue?

Thanks.

Doesn't look like it breaks anything too fundamental for Debian stable.
I've commit it as it is: most Debian stable users will use the zsh .deb
anyway and that won't be affected.

Oliver