From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7527 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2004 12:58:43 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 1 Mar 2004 12:58:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 20502 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2004 12:58:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 19508 Received: (qmail 20488 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2004 12:58:32 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Mar 2004 12:58:32 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [130.95.128.56] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 1 Mar 2004 12:58:31 -0000 Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dummy.domain.name (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E59C368DE8 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 20:58:30 +0800 (WST) Received: from gulag.gu.uwa.edu.au (gulag.guild.uwa.edu.au [130.95.100.5]) by asclepius.uwa.edu.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42995368DCF for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 20:58:30 +0800 (WST) Received: from gulag.gu.uwa.edu.au (devenish@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gulag.gu.uwa.edu.au (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id i21CwTFN009168 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 20:58:29 +0800 Received: (from devenish@localhost) by gulag.gu.uwa.edu.au (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id i21CwSVD009166 for zsh-workers@sunsite.dk; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 20:58:28 +0800 Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 20:58:28 +0800 From: James Devenish To: Zsh hackers list Subject: Re: yodl discontinued. Message-ID: <20040301125828.GA8851@mail.guild.uwa.edu.au> Mail-Followup-To: Zsh hackers list References: <3845.1078140899@trentino.logica.co.uk> <23603.1078142069@csr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <23603.1078142069@csr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i In message <23603.1078142069@csr.com> on Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 11:54:29AM +0000, Peter Stephenson wrote: > As long as we can get info, I think that's good enough. If makeinfo > produces DocBook output, is the reverse true? I don't think we need > texinfo as such since we can get PDF another way. > > (I would say, however, that neither of the obvious ways of turning > FO --- the intermediate output stage, akin to DVI --- into PDF is > entirely satisfactory. Either you need a full Java set up or a > fairly particular TeX set up. It is possible to get from DocBook XML to PDF via LaTeX without going through FO (requires plain old teTeX, but does not require Java unless you hit xsltproc bugs). I don't know about DocBook-to-info, though.