From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6515 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2004 21:36:35 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 1 Mar 2004 21:36:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 7417 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2004 21:36:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 19516 Received: (qmail 7404 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2004 21:36:26 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Mar 2004 21:36:26 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [63.249.88.2] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 1 Mar 2004 21:36:25 -0000 Received: by binome.blorf.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CC8FA4907; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:36:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:36:24 -0800 From: Wayne Davison To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Q: do we want the void* patch? Message-ID: <20040301213624.GA18698@blorf.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i To revisit my patch in zsh-workers/19445, I didn't get a response to my last query asking if we want to include it. Was the consensus that we don't need it? I think that including it would help us to ensure that the optimizer doesn't over-optimize certain aliased memory locations. ..wayne..