From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20252 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2004 19:27:16 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 4 Apr 2004 19:27:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 8057 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2004 19:27:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 19726 Received: (qmail 8044 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2004 19:27:06 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Apr 2004 19:27:06 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [130.225.247.86] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 4 Apr 2004 19:27:5 -0000 Received: (qmail 23717 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2004 19:27:05 -0000 Received: from cmailg1.svr.pol.co.uk (195.92.195.171) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 4 Apr 2004 19:27:04 -0000 Received: from modem-96.maryland.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.137.71.96] helo=pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk) by cmailg1.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BADGo-0005LD-U2; Sun, 04 Apr 2004 20:27:03 +0100 Received: by pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 501) id 8E1978545; Sun, 4 Apr 2004 15:29:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CBB78543; Sun, 4 Apr 2004 20:29:48 +0100 (BST) To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk, cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: zsh and line breaks In-reply-to: "Bart Schaefer"'s message of "Sat, 03 Apr 2004 20:35:04 -0000." <1040403203504.ZM15601@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 20:29:47 +0100 From: Peter Stephenson Message-Id: <20040404192948.8E1978545@pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 on a.mx.sunsite.dk X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=6.0 tests=RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Hits: 1.5 Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Apr 2, 5:23pm, Peter A. Castro wrote: > } > } On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Peter A. Castro wrote: > } > } So, now I need a ruling on just where to put this fix. > > I don't know that I can give you a "ruling" but in my opinion it would be > fine to put this in main.c, appropriately #ifdef'd. I agree, there's nothing magic about main.c. The only reason it's short is because usually it's convenient for as much stuff as possible to be in zsh.dll, on systems where that needs to exist. Your case is exactly the opposite, so main.c is fine. -- Peter Stephenson Work: pws@csr.com Web: http://www.pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk