From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6757 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2004 18:14:54 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 15 Apr 2004 18:14:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 18601 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2004 18:14:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 19783 Received: (qmail 18589 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2004 18:14:49 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Apr 2004 18:14:49 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [130.225.247.86] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 15 Apr 2004 18:14:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 27573 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2004 18:14:49 -0000 Received: from acolyte.scowler.net (216.254.112.45) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 15 Apr 2004 18:14:47 -0000 Received: by acolyte.scowler.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4266F70047; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 14:14:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 14:14:20 -0400 From: Clint Adams To: "Peter A. Castro" Cc: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: zsh and line breaks Message-ID: <20040415181420.GA16594@scowler.net> References: <29767.1081186817@csr.com> <20040415050315.GA26270@scowler.net> <20040415103541.GA9060@scowler.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 on a.mx.sunsite.dk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=6.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Hits: 0.0 > zsh.texi source, no processing of it into html is done. Hmmm... Ok, this > is will break a full build (sans -doc), I see that now. So, you are > correct, the ${sdir} reference should be removed. Sorry! And, thanks > for pointing it out! Presumably it would be useful to handle both situations, though I'm not sure how. > I'll have to decide what I want to do for the Cygwin port, but certainly > this should be corrected in cvs. So, what's the procedure? Do I need to > submit a patch to undo my original patch or can someone with cvs access > (Peter S?) simply back that part of the patch out? I'll just revert it.