From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21152 invoked from network); 25 May 2004 18:47:57 -0000 Received: from thor.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.86) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 25 May 2004 18:47:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 29528 invoked from network); 25 May 2004 18:47:39 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 25 May 2004 18:47:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 3602 invoked by alias); 25 May 2004 18:47:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 19977 Received: (qmail 3590 invoked from network); 25 May 2004 18:47:37 -0000 Received: from thor.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (qmailr@130.225.247.86) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 25 May 2004 18:47:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 29399 invoked from network); 25 May 2004 18:47:33 -0000 Received: from dsl3-63-249-88-2.cruzio.com (HELO binome.blorf.net) (63.249.88.2) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 25 May 2004 18:47:32 -0000 Received: by binome.blorf.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 42D2812BF1; Tue, 25 May 2004 11:47:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 11:47:30 -0700 From: Wayne Davison To: Peter Stephenson Cc: Zsh hackers list Subject: Re: Job table full Message-ID: <20040525184730.GE7832@blorf.net> References: <20040525175605.GD7832@blorf.net> <200405251819.i4PIJOTL007015@news01.csr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200405251819.i4PIJOTL007015@news01.csr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 on a.mx.sunsite.dk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=6.0 tests=BAYES_44 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Hits: -0.0 On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 07:19:24PM +0100, Peter Stephenson wrote: > So the-test-that-no-one-understands should simply have > `thisjob != -1' in it, as in other places in the code. I think it would also be good to change the type of jobtabsize and maxjob from "size_t" to "int" so that we don't have a bunch of signed/unsigned comparisons in the code. Since other job-number variables are ints, this should be fine. ..wayne..