From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10135 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2005 16:07:08 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 14 Jan 2005 16:07:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 59089 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2005 16:07:00 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 14 Jan 2005 16:07:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 27246 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2005 16:06:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 20712 Received: (qmail 27232 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2005 16:06:45 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 14 Jan 2005 16:06:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 58744 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2005 16:06:45 -0000 Received: from acolyte.scowler.net (216.254.112.45) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 14 Jan 2005 16:06:40 -0000 Received: by acolyte.scowler.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 53E5B7004D; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:06:36 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:06:36 -0500 From: Clint Adams To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois-Xavier?= Coudert Cc: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: Some groundwork for Unicode in Zle Message-ID: <20050114160636.GA23825@scowler.net> References: <20050114155411.GA23624@clipper.ens.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050114155411.GA23624@clipper.ens.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 on a.mx.sunsite.dk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=6.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Hits: -2.6 > I'm new to the list but I'm interested in UTF-8 inclusion into Zle. My > question is the following: have you considered the possibility of keeping > storing strings like the line edited in arrays of char (and not wide > chars), while using a few functions to handle the fact that one Unicode > character may be represented by a few chars (and one glyph by a few > Unicode characters, but I'm not sure how this can be handled). See http://www.zsh.org/mla/workers/2001/msg02753.html for some discussion about this.