From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19828 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2005 09:42:42 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 23 Feb 2005 09:42:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 76873 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2005 09:42:36 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 23 Feb 2005 09:42:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 22419 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2005 09:42:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 20849 Received: (qmail 22405 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2005 09:42:31 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 23 Feb 2005 09:42:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 76495 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2005 09:42:31 -0000 Received: from morda.newmail.ru (HELO flock1.newmail.ru) (212.48.140.150) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 23 Feb 2005 09:42:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 8902 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2005 09:27:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.1?) (arvidjaar@newmail.ru@83.237.208.168) by smtpd.newmail.ru with SMTP; 23 Feb 2005 09:27:26 -0000 From: Andrey Borzenkov To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: How ANSI can we assume C? Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 12:42:25 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200502231223.08125.arvidjaar@newmail.ru> In-Reply-To: <200502231223.08125.arvidjaar@newmail.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502231242.26138.arvidjaar@newmail.ru> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 on a.mx.sunsite.dk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=6.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Hits: -2.6 On Wednesday 23 February 2005 12:23, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > As long as widechar support remains conditional, defining wide/non-wide > versions really becomes nightmare. > > Specifically I'd like simply use > > #define ZWC(c) L ## c (or even L ## 'c') ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ nope, bad idea > > and use it everyhere. It is much easier to use than inventing obscure names > for characters. > And it also allows wide strings in place which is fast impossible otherwise without tons of ifdef