From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-21012-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 27101 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2005 18:02:15 -0000
Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 18 Mar 2005 18:02:15 -0000
Received: (qmail 88369 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2005 18:02:09 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90)
  by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 18 Mar 2005 18:02:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 188 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2005 18:02:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 21012
Received: (qmail 178 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2005 18:02:06 -0000
Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88)
  by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 18 Mar 2005 18:02:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 88080 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2005 18:02:06 -0000
Received: from dsl3-63-249-88-2.cruzio.com (HELO dot.blorf.net) (63.249.88.2)
  by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 18 Mar 2005 18:02:02 -0000
Received: by dot.blorf.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id E3E0AAB59; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:02:01 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:02:01 -0800
From: Wayne Davison <wayned@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@newmail.ru>
Cc: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk
Subject: Re: revisiting history-file rewriting
Message-ID: <20050318180201.GE5500@blorf.net>
References: <20050316204059.GA1298@blorf.net> <slrnd3hpn7.4uj.mason@g.primenet.com.au> <20050317024919.GD13937@blorf.net> <200503181918.30617.arvidjaar@newmail.ru> <20050318175145.GC5500@blorf.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050318175145.GC5500@blorf.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 on a.mx.sunsite.dk
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=6.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,UPPERCASE_25_50 
	autolearn=no version=3.0.2
X-Spam-Hits: -2.6

On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 09:51:45AM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> Do you not use any of the history-appending options (e.g.
> APPEND_HISTORY or SHARE_HISTORY)?

Oops, I just realized that it is INC_APPEND_HISTORY that causes no
contention at shell exit, not APPEND_HISTORY (SHARE_HISTORY was right).

..wayne..