From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12792 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2005 01:18:29 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 29 Apr 2005 01:18:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 60902 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2005 01:18:23 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 29 Apr 2005 01:18:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 2535 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2005 01:18:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 21213 Received: (qmail 2513 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2005 01:18:16 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 29 Apr 2005 01:18:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 60496 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2005 01:18:16 -0000 Received: from dsl3-63-249-88-2.cruzio.com (HELO dot.blorf.net) (63.249.88.2) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 29 Apr 2005 01:18:11 -0000 Received: by dot.blorf.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E6D432854; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 18:18:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 18:18:09 -0700 From: Wayne Davison To: "Batalov, Denis" Cc: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: BUG? Zsh does not print the last line of stdout of a child process if that line does not have newline char at end. BUG? Message-ID: <20050429011809.GE16419@blorf.net> References: <897DED128797EC46906FF8EDDBFB5DD03F8D38@ex-mail-sea-02.ant.amazon.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <897DED128797EC46906FF8EDDBFB5DD03F8D38@ex-mail-sea-02.ant.amazon.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 on a.mx.sunsite.dk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=6.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Hits: -2.6 On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 02:51:13PM -0700, Batalov, Denis wrote: > $ echo -n gogi > $ I like the precmd solution mentioned in the FAQ: http://zsh.sunsite.dk/FAQ/zshfaq03.html#l40 (Note to FAQ maintainer: the index appears to be off by one -- it linked to l39, but the answer appears to be l40.) ..wayne..