From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28613 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2005 13:00:07 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 24 Jul 2005 13:00:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 45824 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2005 13:00:01 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 24 Jul 2005 13:00:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 27295 invoked by alias); 24 Jul 2005 12:59:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 21516 Received: (qmail 27286 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2005 12:59:58 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 24 Jul 2005 12:59:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 45605 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2005 12:59:58 -0000 Received: from acolyte.scowler.net (216.254.112.45) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 24 Jul 2005 12:59:52 -0000 Received: by acolyte.scowler.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 99AD570055; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:59:51 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:59:51 -0400 From: Clint Adams To: Bart Schaefer Cc: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: PATCH: nitpick Message-ID: <20050724125951.GA7937@scowler.net> Mail-Followup-To: Bart Schaefer , zsh-workers@sunsite.dk References: <20050724031249.GA28042@scowler.net> <1050724051656.ZM20368@candle.brasslantern.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1050724051656.ZM20368@candle.brasslantern.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 > Maybe it's just because I'm tired, but I don't understand what the > functional difference is? Other than the xtrace output ... It's a /bin/sh script, so the existence of the binary -a is not guaranteed, and if the expression were more complex, the operator precedence could be ambiguous too.